As we begin to prepare for the upcoming proxy season, I find myself reflecting the evolution of the Executive Summary to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and how, although not required, it’s become a standard feature of almost every CD&A. While the content of the Executive Summary can (and does) vary among companies, most of them include a section summarizing the key compensation actions and decisions for the last completed fiscal year, often including detailed information on cash compensation paid and equity awards granted to the company’s named executive officers.
For some companies, such as newly-public companies, the design features of the current executive compensation program can be just as important to disclose as the amounts received by the NEOs. I was reminded of this while taking a look at the recently-filed definitive proxy statement of Sonos, Inc. The company completed its initial public offering in the fall of 2018 and, like most newly-public companies, has been transitioning its executive compensation arrangements from those of a privately-held to a public reporting company over the past year. Accordingly, in the Executive Summary to its Compensation Discussion and Analysis, it focuses largely on the design of, rather than the actions taken under, its executive compensation program:
Fiscal 2019 was our first full year as a publicly-traded company, and many of our compensation decisions for the last year reflect our transition from private to public ownership. Prior to going public, Sonos’ historical compensation philosophy was to provide relatively low cash compensation (both base salaries and bonuses) and use equity incentives, primarily in the form of stock options, as the primary form of compensation. However, in order to continue to attract high quality executives and employees, we recognized that we needed to be more competitive on cash compensation going forward, and we also shifted to granting RSUs rather than options as our primary form of annual equity incentive to better align with market practices.
Highlights of key changes made as part of our transition include:
This can be a useful lead-in to the discussion and analysis of individual compensation elements elsewhere in the CD&A, especially if the design changes to the program are taking place over more than one year (which is often the case). I note that here the company has also incorporated selected details about its fiscal 2019 compensation decisions and outcomes into the discussion, which makes it easier for a reader to get a high-level overview of the compensation actions taken without having to look elsewhere in the CD&A for that information.
-Mark Borges, CompensationStandards.com January 20, 2020
Great. Enter your email address and gain
instant access to this article
After sign up, we’ll get in touch to help you find the resources that will benefit you the most.